quote

May 7, 2008 at 1:47 pm (culture, persuasion, politics, psychology, trends)

“What good fortune for those in power that people do not think.”

Interesting thought, especially when you consider the role of the music or movie industries or even advertising in popular culture. I often find people in the biz that consider others - especially consumers - as fools. Then they deliver mediocrity of a kind that is really unacceptable, but it is often lapped up!

Unfortunate that those words are Hitler’s and we still see his vision play out day after day around us. Isn’t it time that people became less naive to the phenomenon? It might be wise to heighten awareness and learn how to see through sugar-coated manipulations. But more than anything else, I wish we would all pay just a little heed to to our intuition.

Permalink No Comments

how to regrow a finger

April 30, 2008 at 11:48 pm (innovation, people, science)

Apparently, there’s some sort of “pixie dust” created by Dr. Stephen Badylak (University of Pittsburgh) that can help regenerate tissue. An Ohio man accidentally lost a sizeable bit of a finger, then brushed the “extracellular matrix” (the scientific name) on, and it grew back in 4 months.

The regrown finger tip (nail and all) is not just cosmetic but entirely functional. The substance seemingly prevents scar tissue from forming and is processed from the lining of a pig’s bladder in a lab. If you are thinking how naive or nuts I am, then read (and watch) it on today’s BBC news. I’m in utter disbelief myself!

Permalink No Comments

nostalgic

April 25, 2008 at 5:23 pm (culture, music, people)

I’ve been missing Austin, Texas very much. And when you think of that city, gosh, how you crave it’s awesome local music scene. Here for one is the brilliant Guy Forsyth Band performing Taxi live. So good! Enjoy.

Permalink No Comments

a thought

April 25, 2008 at 3:28 pm (communication, language, random, writing)

“Writing is a form of personal freedom. It frees us from the mass identity we see in the making all around us. In the end, writers will write not to be outlaw heroes of some underculture but mainly to … survive as individuals.”

This is a quote from Don Delillio, a writer born in 1926 in NYC. It brings to mind how important the sense of individuality that develops when you write is. And I think it explains why I deeply feel that everyone should regularly write (albeit merely the perspective of the social psychologist in me). See it’s tough to make make too many assumptions when you write, which in turn sparks freedom of thought.

But there’s one more thing I realize as I blog about this: while writing may be highly individualistic, the act of publishing, no matter how small the scale, is distinctly collectivistic. It is an effort for your thoughts to be known - and this involves not just yourself but virtual strangers. Writing for others sparks freedom of speech. (Call this bit the social activist in me if you will.)

Okay, so I’m not sure what my point exactly is, but I needed to put this down, if only for starters. A somewhat-related article I read in the New York Times today deals with the fascinating interaction between our language and our thoughts. Here it is. (If you don’t already have an account, you may have to sign up for NY Times, but it’s simple, free, and very worth it.)

Permalink 2 Comments

unbelievable

April 24, 2008 at 6:48 pm (people, politics, public speaking, the world)

Hillary Clinton said a couple of days ago: I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran. In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally OBLITERATE them. This DEMOCRATIC candidate’s willingness to be perceived as the next war-president of the US is both sickening and scary. What exactly is going on?!?!

Permalink No Comments

anatomy of a controversy

April 23, 2008 at 12:36 am (advertising, branding, culture, india, marketing)

Free some underwear from those irksome dangling tags to get a pretty good product: Hanes Tagless Underwear. Then come up with some well-conceived copy to sell it: Because the world gives you enough tags. Add a tri-series of neat artwork. So far, so good, right? Now, add a dash of sensationalism, let a mindless handful of viewers get a peek, and there it suddenly is: the perfect recipe for a disaster. McCann India is the ad agency in question and their campaign - now withdrawn - had 3 print ads. The first showed a vivid bunch of “gay” things, the second had a collage of stereotypically “black” things, and the third depicted an assortment of “Pakistani” stuff.

People have been calling the campaign “anti-gay” and “racist”. How is it either of those things? The fact that it was seen as biased is odd; it’s anything but! (The only thing that does bother me about the campaign is that people who aren’t really aware of the stereotypes in question will indeed become so after seeing it.) Yes, the executions are hard-hitting for the times, but I also think that the basic brand idea borders on brilliant! And that is what McCann’s defense should have been - instead of the spineless apology they actually mustered up.

Permalink 2 Comments

knock em out, lilly

April 21, 2008 at 12:42 am (culture, entertainment, music, people)

I’m typically not in to ‘pop’ but, like Amy Winehouse, Lilly Allen makes for an addictive exception. She deserves many kudos for her gritty lyrics, mired in funky beats and slick melody. All of 23, she’s made a formidable debut with her album called Alright Still, on which you will find a slew of great songs…

Alfie is about her little brother who smokes a bit, well, much. There’s also a song in which she makes fun of her granny’s colostomy bag, in Nan You’re a Window Shopper. (So terrible, Lilly!) In LDN she talks about the sights she sees as she rides through the park - you won’t guess how sorry those sights are unless you listen closely. Take What You Take is unbelievably catchy, but my absolute favourite is Shame For You when she says: “Oh my gosh must be jokin’ me, if you think that you’ll be pokin’ me, don’t take me on, no no!”

Very funny. As her target audience might say: truly wicked. If there’s one song that captures all of her attitude though, then it’s this one: have a listen!

PS: Is there a good reason why, when it comes to decent pop, the British trump the Americans? I’ll have to save that for another day.

Permalink No Comments

god-fearing

April 13, 2008 at 12:57 am (culture, language, religion, trends) ()

Perhaps we should take great objection to the mere existence of the word. It’s a blight on what should be our relationship with the creator; that is, of course, assuming there is one. But whether or not there is one, it is clear that fear should be no part of any equation that a being has with its universe at large.

Why then do words like ‘god-fearing’ crop up in so many manifestations of all kinds of organized religion? It’s a sad reflection on how we willingly we allow ourselves to be controlled - not only by “religion” but also by fashion, tradition, whatchamacallition. Like Ben Harper might say, it’s high time we fought for our minds.

Incidentally, he has a song called ‘God-Fearing Man’ on his CD called ‘Fight For Your Mind’. But here’s yet another - and perhaps more fitting - of his songs instead.

Permalink No Comments

velleity

April 11, 2008 at 11:30 pm (language, writing)

Came across a cool ‘new’ word today. It’s pronounced vull-ay-it-ee.

[Noun]
.
1 : the lowest degree of volition
2 : a slight wish or tendency : inclination
.
Example: Samuel sometimes mentions that he would like to go back to school, but his interest strikes me as more of a velleity than a firm statement of purpose.
.
Etymology: It is a derivative of the New Latin noun “velleitas,” from the Latin verb “velle,” meaning “to wish or will.” You might also wish to know that “velle” is the word that gave us “voluntary” (by way of Anglo-French “voluntarie” and Latin “voluntarius”) and “volunteer” (by way of French “voluntaire”). While both of those words might imply a wish to do something (specifically, to offer one’s help) and the will to act upon it, the less common “velleity” refers to a wish or inclination that is so insignificant that a person feels little or no compulsion to act.
.
I like it very much somehow!

Permalink No Comments

singular

April 6, 2008 at 11:41 pm (advertising, branding, creativity)

Much of course has been said on the topic of logos, but here are my two cents, nay phils.

There’s a logo for a ‘horseracing city’ in Dubai called Meydan. The logo is simple. It’s a sort of variegated blue background. On it, in a white and very legible font is: Meydan. A thoroughbred destination. That’s the English version. I saw a similar looking logo in Arabic the other day and knew instantaneously what it was for - even though I am thoroughly uninitiated when it comes to reading the script.

Compare this to tonnes of other logos around that try and do too much - fancy color schemes, an effort to communicate not just the company but it’s holding company as well, fonts that overwhelm, and taglines so verbose or rehashed that they repel. It’s often pretty unnecessary, largely ineffective and highly forgettable stuff…

So ditch the clutter and think Nike, Fedex, and Apple instead! I believe the message is simple.

Permalink No Comments

« Previous entries