ramble free

January 3, 2009 at 3:59 pm (creativity, language, psychology, random, writing)

Feel the need to write today. About nothing specific, just to write.

I wonder what the act of writing does – psychologically. While you are writing, there is a heightened sense of belief in your thoughts, a strengthening of conviction in your feelings. There is also an evolution of existent thoughts and feelings that might not ordinarily occur.

Most important for me: there’s a withering away, whether fleeting or lasting, of self-doubt. And the thought of creating a starkish black and white, from your typically thousand shades of grey, is nice. After that, you glide back in to a kind of cognitive twilight from where you came.

The twilight is neither a dark nor claustrophobic one. In fact, it is a space without boundaries – quite different from the world of words. There are no letters and no word is set in stone. Thoughts are malleable, grammar has little to say, vocabulary is only as big as the next word, and you are free to place commas (or not) between a myriad visuals. It’s that one place where there is utter freedom of thought.

While that freedom does not vanish when you articulate something, there are certainly great constraints put on it when you do. Suddenly, you are limited by something inane – like the last preposition you used or your resistance to the semi-colon. Sometimes there comes along a metaphor; it lets you roam a bit more easily.

All this, of course, happens as you write. After you are done, there is that sweet sense of accomplishment for having been a composer. No matter how the composition turns out…

Permalink 6 Comments

the good life

September 29, 2008 at 10:54 pm (america, communication, creativity, education, globalization, inspiration, language, people, persuasion, psychology, public speaking, the world, trends, vision and entrepreneurship, writing)

Anyone who has visited this blog more than a couple of times may have sensed my tremendous reverence for Sir Ken Robinson’s speech at the TED 2006 conference in California. A few months ago, JK Rowling delivered another wonderfully inspiring speech at a graduation ceremony at Harvard. This address by the Harry Potteress, if you will, comes extremely close to evoking the resonance created in me by Robinson.

Their themes are similar in part. The overlap lies in their descriptions of how people are typically held back from finding their talents. Robinson talks of how kids are often pushed in to doing things that they are not designed to do. This detracts from their uniqueness and leads to the feeling of having failed from within – no matter how successful they may appear to be from the outside.

JK Rowling speaks of her own experience as a mother in a financially dire situation who finally found the courage required to live her life with authenticity: She said: “So why do I talk about the benefits of failure? Simply because failure meant a stripping away of the inessential. I stopped pretending to myself that I was anything other than what I was, and began to direct all my energy into finishing the only work that mattered to me. Had I really succeeded at anything else, I might never have found the determination to succeed in the one arena I believed I truly belonged. I was set free, because my greatest fear had already been realised, and I was still alive, and I still had a daughter whom I adored, and I had an old typewriter and a big idea. And so rock bottom became the solid foundation on which I rebuilt my life.”

Robinson gave the example of Gillian Lynne, now a British ballerina, who was taken to a doctor when she was still in school for being miserable at her studies. The doctor was wise enough to tell her mother that her child didn’t have ADHD but that she did have the fidgetiness of a dancer. He encouraged her mother to enroll her in a dance school. In Robinson’s words: “Gillian was eventually auditioned for the Royal Ballet school. She became a soloist and had a wonderful career there. She founded her own dance company. She met Andrew Lloyd Webber. She has been responsible for some of the most successful theater productions in history. She has given pleasure to millions. And she’s a multi-millionaire. Somebody else might have put her on medication and told her to calm down.”

Bravo to both speakers!

Rowling took the idea a step ahead. She spoke of how getting in touch with ourselves then helps us to get in touch with others. She talked about how it enables us to use our power of imagination to empathize with those less fortunate than us. That, most beautifully, is her definition of a good life – which is what she eventually wished upon the graduating class of 2008.

I have always thought that “the good life” is not one in which you have acquired material things and been a conventional success, but one in which you have been true to yourself; it is the only way in which you can be true to others. Believe me, I know how tough it is. But I also deeply feel how vital it is, not just for our own wellbeing but also for that of those around us; for our children, our spouses, our families, our employers, our employees, our countries, our world – whether strangers or friends.

Finally, Rowling had an important point to make for the youth of ’superpower’ America – which figures in this moving excerpt from her speech.

“Amnesty International mobilises thousands of people who have never been tortured or imprisoned for their beliefs to act on behalf of those who have. The power of human empathy, leading to collective action, saves lives, and frees prisoners. Ordinary people, whose personal well-being and security are assured, join together in huge numbers to save people they do not know, and will never meet. My small participation in that process was one of the most humbling and inspiring experiences of my life.

Unlike any other creature on this planet, humans can learn and understand, without having experienced. They can think themselves into other people’s minds, imagine themselves into other people’s places.

Of course, this is a power, like my brand of fictional magic, that is morally neutral. One might use such an ability to manipulate, or control, just as much as to understand or sympathise.

And many prefer not to exercise their imaginations at all. They choose to remain comfortably within the bounds of their own experience, never troubling to wonder how it would feel to have been born other than they are. They can refuse to hear screams or to peer inside cages; they can close their minds and hearts to any suffering that does not touch them personally; they can refuse to know.

I might be tempted to envy people who can live that way, except that I do not think they have any fewer nightmares than I do. Choosing to live in narrow spaces can lead to a form of mental agoraphobia, and that brings its own terrors. I think the wilfully unimaginative see more monsters. They are often more afraid.

What is more, those who choose not to empathise may enable real monsters. For without ever committing an act of outright evil ourselves, we collude with it, through our own apathy.

One of the many things I learned at the end of that Classics corridor down which I ventured at the age of 18, in search of something I could not then define, was this, written by the Greek author Plutarch: What we achieve inwardly will change outer reality.

That is an astonishing statement and yet proven a thousand times every day of our lives. It expresses, in part, our inescapable connection with the outside world, the fact that we touch other people’s lives simply by existing.

But how much more are you, Harvard graduates of 2008, likely to touch other people’s lives? Your intelligence, your capacity for hard work, the education you have earned and received, give you unique status, and unique responsibilities. Even your nationality sets you apart. The great majority of you belong to the world’s only remaining superpower. The way you vote, the way you live, the way you protest, the pressure you bring to bear on your government, has an impact way beyond your borders. That is your privilege, and your burden.

If you choose to use your status and influence to raise your voice on behalf of those who have no voice; if you choose to identify not only with the powerful, but with the powerless; if you retain the ability to imagine yourself into the lives of those who do not have your advantages, then it will not only be your proud families who celebrate your existence, but thousands and millions of people whose reality you have helped transform for the better. We do not need magic to change the world, we carry all the power we need inside ourselves already: we have the power to imagine better.”

Hear hear! Powerful thoughts and words indeed.

Permalink 6 Comments

cadillac

September 3, 2008 at 3:54 am (creativity, culture, entertainment, music, people, random)

I saw the Andy Walo Trio play at House of Blues in Los Angeles, and haven’t been able to get this song out of my head for a year. It’s called Cadillac and you can find it on their Myspace Music page. There’s something about blues-rock that I can throw myself in to. (It’s not as self-indulgent as either just blues or just rock – gives you more of a chance to get out of yourself and in to its groove.) But don’t let me trivialize this tune as merely a good distraction. It’s great! The gimmicky get-back to the main riff is totally awesome, each and every time they do it.

Permalink Leave a Comment

tell the story

August 31, 2008 at 10:44 pm (communication, creativity, inspiration, random, writing)

I’ve been reading about writing, if only to procrastinate.

I find it hard to actually sit down and begin to write a story. Except for a short one I wrote in Austin, which was fun but not particularly good if I may add, and the odd composition in school, I have not delved in to fiction very much. You see the scientificist ( ;) ) in me won’t allow it.

Excuses, excuses.

So I came across a tips-for-amateur-storytellers type website out there. It said: Open a book at random. Write down the first sentence you see. Now tell the story from there.

Here goes then.

The loneliness was still there, but it was getting louder and easier to dance to.

Wow.

Permalink 6 Comments

great PSA

August 31, 2008 at 7:21 pm (advertising, communication, corporate responsibility, creativity, entertainment, television)

Public service advertising can be so amazing. Check this one from Television Espanola out, it’s totally precious.

Translation: If your best friend doesn’t want to stay with you anymore, maybe you are watching too much TV. 

If an NBC had released this ad instead of a TVE, it would have fit the “corporate responsibility” bill perfectly!

Permalink Leave a Comment

deck the wall

August 28, 2008 at 12:57 am (art, creativity, culture, dubai, innovation, people)

I have a friend, a highly talented art director, who’s created an amazing series of Dubai cityscapes. It’s not glamor-and-glitz but down-to-earth and often gritty stuff that he captures. Most of it is done on used, flattened cardboard boxes, although he does have a fruit paper-tray or two in the mix! Click on each for a closer look at these two pieces of his art, now happily mine. He has more, so if you like what you see, let me know and I will gladly get you in touch with Fabo.

Permalink 3 Comments

think like a kid!

August 26, 2008 at 4:59 pm (communication, creativity, culture, education, inspiration, people, random)

We sometimes use a cool creative tool to brainstorm at work. Basically, you each pull one of a pack of cards. (Every card bears a different anecdote and an associated technique.) Then you play the role that the card suggests within the team for a bit, until it’s time to pull the next card. It’s a fun and remarkably useful exercise! Here is one I especially like…

Permalink Leave a Comment

dissatisfied?

August 21, 2008 at 2:32 am (communication, creativity, culture, education, psychology, sociology, trends)

Consider the following aspects of job satisfaction.

1) The EMOTIONAL (i.e. people are doing work they personally enjoy and when they know that the outcome of their work is meaningful)

2) The SOCIAL (when one works with people one likes and respects, where feedback is appropriate, and where the motivation to perform is positive)

3) The PHYSICAL (whether it be manual labor that is not abusive or about a comfortable, easily accessible office for a white-collar worker)

4) The FINANCIAL (I realize how subjective the phrase “well-paid” is; but let’s say that “well” implies a cool savings of at least a fifth of monthly pay.)

I have a feeling that a strong fulfillment of just one or two of the above could lead a person to say they are pretty satisfied at their job overall. For example, let’s say you are getting remunerated at a high level; that might negate the ill effects of all other aspects. Or for example, if you aren’t, but you adore your colleagues, you may grin and bear the fact that you don’t absolutely love your work either. This might be a tad simplistic, but you get the drift…

And yet, the percentage of people who are extremely dissatisfied at their jobs these days is spectacular. Well, why?

It would be easy to primarily blame issues with the last factor on the list – inadequate compensation is indeed a major concern in most economies today. But how about we focus on the first two for a bit.

The kind of work you choose to do obviously influences to a great extent how much you enjoy your work. Do your aptitude and abilities match your profession? If not, you are probably not alone. People are often socially pressured to take up jobs they are doomed to dislike. Many of us have heard things like: “Don’t do music, you won’t get a job doing that!” or “Where’s the money in studying art?” or “Whatever would you do with a degree in language when you grow up?”

Sir Ken Robinson has given a remarkable speech (Do schools kill creativity?) on what the consequences of discouraging kids from their natural affinities are. I do not blame society for putting pressure on their children to become engineers and accountants. I see that the advice is well-intentioned – but it is not necessarily right. And what ends up happening is the creation of a world where people are not synched up with their jobs, which then contributes significantly to job dissatisfaction – and ultimately reduces commitment and productivity at personal and organizational levels.

The issue above is a huge one and needs much attention. Even so, let’s say you chose to do what you want to, or even if you chose to do what you can at least tolerate doing. Unfortunately, there’s a bigger hurdle that often creeps up. Typically, after the initial novelty of a work place has worn away, you begin to grapple with a work culture that is far from ideal.

It’s not often that workplaces elicit the kind of sentiment that companies like Google do…

More on work culture in an upcoming post.

Permalink 5 Comments

more on outsourcing

August 1, 2008 at 11:25 am (creativity, globalization, the world, trends, vision and entrepreneurship)

In a brilliant article called Revenge of the Right Brain in Wired magazine, Daniel Pink brings a fresh perspective to the outsourcing issue. I first read it about 3 years ago and highly recommend it even today. Here’s a synopsis, with a few of my own thoughts thrown in.

Pink first establishes how our left brains help us with linearity, logic, literal thinking and analysis while our right brains are more about emotion, synthesis, creativity, context, and meaning. So while left-brained thinking dominates in professions like accounting, engineering, and programming, the right brain manifests more strongly in artists, care-providers, and others professions grounded in holistic thinking. We obviously typically need both halves to function. For example, a judge would use both halves of his brain in delivering a verdict – the left that knows the rules that apply and the right that understands the context of the case at hand. And like we use both sides to process this picture below.

There is debate over how stark the dichotomy in brain function is, but there is certainly something to it. Here’s something interesting I learned in neuropsychology: research on patients with localized brain damage has shown that relying primarily on the left brain (which is more straightforward and computer-like in function than the right), we would likely see the picture above merely as “a bunch of fruits, flowers, and veggies.” And if the activity were situated mostly in the right brain (which gets the ‘big picture’ and dwells in metaphor more than the left), we would see the picture above as “a colorful man.” How cool is that!

What does that have to do with outsourcing? Pink’s contention is that as left-brained work gets outsourced more to developing countries, the rest will have to enhance the use of right-brainedness in business – a phenomenon that will shape significantly the progress of our world. (Do read his article if you fancy this drift.)

I see outsourcing as leading to a shift in balance. And, I firmly believe, it’s not about the balance of power – a lens through which many, rather unfortunately, tend to view the issue. It’s bigger than that; it’s much more about how we evolve rather than who gets to rule the world. Here is an excerpt from Pink that speaks to the point…

If the Industrial Age was built on people’s backs, and the Information Age on people’s left hemispheres, the Conceptual Age is being built on people’s right hemispheres. We’ve progressed from a society of farmers to a society of factory workers to a society of knowledge workers. And now we’re progressing yet again – to a society of creators and empathizers, pattern recognizers, and meaning makers.

Permalink 6 Comments

cute cubed

July 24, 2008 at 11:40 pm (creativity, entertainment, food, random)

In a google search for “the role of design in branding”, I found this totally cute video on youtube. Amazing art direction! 

PS: My favourite parts were the dicing of the Rubik’s cube and the shaving of the Post-it notes, but really all of it makes you smile. :)

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »